Table of Contents
|
- Bethune, Donald
- 1 as James Sutherland. But since Elmsley, Bethune's partner in the Niagara, still nursed a grudge
- 2 he spent the next three seasons working for Bethune, returning to the decks of the Niagara (since
- 3 Niagara to Donald Bethune and John Elmsley.16 Bethune, the rising star in the Lake Ontario steamboat
- 4 was retrenching and had sold the Niagara to Donald Bethune and John Elmsley.16 Bethune, the rising star in
- 5 Nor was his position any more secure with Bethune, who had also just passed through a financial
- 6 to gather the materials for the steamer, Bethune began to campaign to have the contract either
- 7 the province, and a silent business partner of Donald Bethune. Among his other commitments Cayley was
- 8 His initial protests having fallen on deaf ears, Bethune launched a petition in the provincial
- 9 secret, and in short giving money to anyone but Bethune and his associates, received a favourable report
- 10 "I have been thwarted in every imaginable way, [Bethune, Dick and Heron's] object being to delay my
- 11 most of the Lake Ontario passenger routes was Donald Bethune. Apart from having a corner on British patronage
- 12 agent, who were using vessels once described as Bethune's "dead stock".55 Subcontracting for some of
- 13 "dead stock".55 Subcontracting for some of Bethune's patronage and a place in the lake mail line
- 14 Kingston and Toronto were Heron and Dick, Bethune's co-petitioners in that summer's legislative
- 15 of this group was reinforced by a mistrust of Bethune, rooted in his inept attempts to extend his
- 16 busy season precipitated another dispute with Bethune. When troops were shipped directly from Kingston
- 17 Kingston to the Niagara frontier on the Magnet, Bethune, who had a contract for this service, was
- 18 reasons he was forced to open negotiations with Bethune for a place in the lake mail line.60
- 19 That Bethune ever seriously considered such overtures reveals
- 20 were beginning to plague his fleet.62 Evidently Bethune concluded it might prove cheaper to subcontract
- 21 Bethune, nevertheless, still held the upper hand and
- 22 end of the 1848 season the sheriff had seized Bethune's vessels and those of his dependents in the
- 23 trade.65 Those who were thankfully counting Bethune out of the shipping trades were given a rude
- 24 for various subcontracts entangled in Bethune's complex bankruptcy proceedings, Sutherland and
- 25 that business would be much more peaceful if Bethune could be eliminated. It was a feeling they
- 26 Together they began a two-part effort to drive Bethune out of the water. The first step was a competing
- 27 A vicious round of price cutting ensued before Bethune surrendered places for the Magnet and Heron and
- 28 the new Kingston-Toronto mail contract. Should Bethune be excluded from this service there would be
- 29 suing for the value of the supplies advanced to Bethune over the 1849 season, the other shipping
- 30 proprietors may be forgiven for believing Bethune to have been ruined.67 Later, Sutherland would
- 31 the value of their tender even higher.68 But Bethune was successful in persuading eighty-one other
- 32 his opposition and began negotiations with Bethune. Despite his general dislike for Bethune and his
- 33 with Bethune. Despite his general dislike for Bethune and his tactics, Sutherland used his superior
- 34 position to assure himself that money paid Bethune for the Magnet's services would be passed on to
- 35 replace the power of the contractor, upon which Bethune's reputation had been built, with that of an
- 36 through line in the 1850 season, they forced Bethune and the major steamboat proprietors to meet them
- 37 was a midnight collision three years later with Bethune's vessel, the Maple Leaf. The Magnet had to be
- 38 he might be, but the constant harassment from Bethune in the early stages of the project demanded both
- 39 on the Toronto-Niagara run was bankrupted by Bethune. He ended his career as Toronto Harbour
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
Return to Home Port
This article originally appeared in Ontario History.
|